Buy-On
Quick Definition
When an opening act pays to be added to a headliner's tour. A controversial practice where emerging artists pay for exposure rather than being paid to perform.
In-Depth Explanation
What is a Buy-On?
A buy-on (sometimes called a "pay-to-play" tour) occurs when an emerging or unsigned artist pays a flat fee to a booking agent, promoter, or a headlining artist's management team for the privilege of being the opening act on a major tour.
In a traditional touring arrangement, the headlining artist is paid a large guarantee, and the supporting acts are paid a smaller guarantee (or a percentage of the door) to warm up the crowd. In a buy-on situation, the economics are reversed: the opening act brings money to the tour.
Why Do Buy-Ons Exist?
Touring is incredibly expensive. Headlining artists face massive costs for production (lights, sound, staging), crew salaries, travel (tour buses, flights), and accommodation. In an effort to offset these massive overhead costs, a tour's booking agent might "sell" the 30-minute opening slot to a wealthy but unknown artist.
If an opening act pays $500 per show for a 30-date tour, that $15,000 goes directly toward paying for the headliner's tour bus or crew.
Why Artists Pay for Buy-Ons
For the opening act, a buy-on is essentially a highly expensive, targeted marketing campaign. They are paying for access to the headliner's built-in audience. The theoretical benefits include:
- Immediate Audience: Playing to thousands of genre-appropriate fans every night who might become their fans.
- Merchandise Sales: The opportunity to recoup the buy-on cost by selling t-shirts and CDs to the large crowds.
- Industry Prestige: Being able to say "Toured with [Famous Artist]" on their press kit, which can help secure future record deals, booking agents, and legitimate paid gigs.
- Networking: The chance to interact with major industry professionals on the road.
The Controversy
Buy-ons are one of the most controversial practices in the live music industry. Many musicians and advocates view them as exploitative.
The Arguments Against Buy-Ons:
- It Devalues Live Music: It reinforces the idea that emerging artists should work for "exposure" rather than financial compensation, suppressing wages for all working musicians.
- It Favors Wealth Over Talent: Buy-ons ensure that the opening slots on major tours go to artists with wealthy backers (often called "trust fund bands") rather than the most talented or hardworking local acts.
- Poor Return on Investment (ROI): Many artists who pay for buy-ons find that the crowd ignores them, the headliner's crew treats them poorly, and they do not sell enough merchandise to recoup their massive initial investment.
- The "Pay-to-Play" Stigma: If industry professionals discover an artist bought their way onto a tour rather than being selected for their merit, it can actually damage their reputation.
Buy-On vs. Local Support
It is important to distinguish a buy-on from "local support." Often, promoters will book a local band to open the show in a specific city. The local band is expected to sell a certain number of tickets to their friends and family to guarantee their spot. If they fail to sell their quota, they might have to buy the remaining tickets themselves. While also controversial, this is generally considered a different practice than a wealthy artist writing a $50,000 check to join a national tour for 30 days.
Should You Do a Buy-On?
Most industry experts advise against buy-ons unless the artist has substantial financial backing, a massive merchandise operation ready to deploy, and a product that is perfectly tailored to the headliner's specific demographic. For 99% of emerging artists, investing that money into targeted digital marketing, high-quality music videos, or a self-funded regional tour is a much safer and more effective way to build a fanbase.
Related Terms
View AllFrom the Blog
View All

